DahlisMarie wrote:oldherbaceous wrote:I was looking fo Dahlismarie, on the Ray Mears show tonight, but i never saw her.

Wot! As road kill????
Lots of bush tucker around here still. I took my 3 grandsons out with an aboriginal ranger once for a bush walk and education on bush tucker. Some of it was really good. Plants I have seen in the bush all my life, but never known you could use them as food. One plant like a clump of reedy grass, when picked and you chew the end, it gives you moisture plus a sweet sugary chew. Like chewing sugar cane.
Also learnt that big banksia flowers can be used as lamps. They are naturally full of oil.
Your forests that have been untouched must be full of native food also. Sounds like an interesting programme.
Sadly Dahlis, the UK has no natural untouched forest.
I live near a National Trust Property called "Hatfield Forest", this has been managed as productive woodland and a rich mans park for centuries, yet is now preserved as a natural resource, being rich in plants and small wildlife.
We have over 60 million people on this small island.
At our National Government Statistics website,
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=760 , it says
"Scotland is the least densely populated of the four countries of the UK. There were 65 people resident per square kilometre in Scotland in 2003. In comparison the population density was 125 people per square kilometre in Northern Ireland, 142 people in Wales and 383 people in England. London had a far higher population density than any of the English regions, with 4,700 people living in each square kilometre on average."
By contrast,
http://www.science.org.au/nova/087/087key.htm , lists Oz at:
"Australia is a large country with a small population. In 2003 we had a population density of 2.5 people per square kilometre"
So that's 153 of me to every one of you.
