Anyone ever done any capillary dynamolysis with plants? looks interesting. Peter
Who knows about capillary dynamolysis?
Moderators: KG Steve, Chantal, Tigger, peter, Chief Spud
-
PeterGreenMan
- KG Regular
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:00 pm
- Location: Wales UK
Anyone ever done any capillary dynamolysis with plants? looks interesting. Peter
- Attachments
-
- capillary dynamolysis2.jpg (2.61 KiB) Viewed 2626 times
-
alan refail
- KG Regular
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:00 am
- Location: Chwilog Gogledd Orllewin Cymru Northwest Wales
- Been thanked: 7 times
For those who are as confused as I was click the confused smiley.
ive had a quick gander , first reaction is its a load of tosh... reminds me of a level chemistry... if dim memories are right if you stand blotting paper in a liquid the solvent will soak up the paper taking with it whatever is dissolved in it, but the different sized molecules of the dissolved stuff travel different distances up the paper.... simple stuff no etheric forces involved.
www.purchon.com/chemistry/chromatography.htm
www.purchon.com/chemistry/chromatography.htm
-
FelixLeiter
- KG Regular
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:18 pm
- Location: East Yorkshire
Chromatography by any other name. Nice pretty patterns, though.
For "capillary dynamolysis" read "scientist too mesmerized by pretty patterns to be bothered to investigate the fundamental processes behind them".
For "capillary dynamolysis" read "scientist too mesmerized by pretty patterns to be bothered to investigate the fundamental processes behind them".
I regret to say that as soon as the name Rudolf Steiner is mentioned I always smell a rat.
It would appear that this woman wasted 56 years of her life because I do not see any conclusion or reasoning in her work.
If only Rudolf Steiner had restricted himself to education, the one thing he was good at. He was a great one with theories and convincing himself and others that they were fact without none of them being proven.
That is how the Soil Association was born! These are the type of scientists that the SA proudly tell you that they were formed by Scientists.
To me it is an absolute load of old B----ks! No good to man or beast.
JB.
It would appear that this woman wasted 56 years of her life because I do not see any conclusion or reasoning in her work.
If only Rudolf Steiner had restricted himself to education, the one thing he was good at. He was a great one with theories and convincing himself and others that they were fact without none of them being proven.
That is how the Soil Association was born! These are the type of scientists that the SA proudly tell you that they were formed by Scientists.
To me it is an absolute load of old B----ks! No good to man or beast.
JB.
