Page 3 of 3

Re: Chelsea 2017

Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 7:23 pm
by Primrose
Tracey Ermin's bed comes to mind ! When I think of the vast cost of transporting all that stone from Malta as well as the construction costs I think the whole thing was was a waste of money. Perhaps Next year the RHS should have a different theme altogether and bring some reality back into being. Make all the plots the size of the average surburbwn garden and set an overall budget of £2000. The big designers would stay away but anybody can create a garden with an unlimited budget. It might be a greater test of their ability to work within much narrower constraints and also encourage the average Joe blogs gardener to think he could actually achieve something interesting with a little time and effort.

Re: Chelsea 2017

Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 8:54 pm
by PLUMPUDDING
I enjoyed seeing the process and thinking behind Charlotte Harris's garden and the colours and perfection of the Japanese man's garden. Chris Beardshaw's looked like a proper garden but he went a bit Arty Farty over the link to music. I prefer birdsong to Beethoven and Mozart in the garden but he was trying to impress us with how clever he is.

Re: Chelsea 2017

Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 7:34 am
by Shallot Man
Looking at one of the winning garden designs, reminded me of tank traps in WW2.

Re: Chelsea 2017

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 7:03 pm
by oldherbaceous
Maybe they know something we don't Shallot Man... :)

Re: Chelsea 2017

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 7:39 pm
by tigerburnie
Lost interest after Tuesday, not watched it since.